Suggestions Box

Please type in your suggestion(s) in brief on any issue related to improvement in various BSNL services, sales, marketing, tariff, infra-structure, day-to-day maintenance etc. Your email ID is required to avoid spam and email ID will not be displayed along with your suggestion. On submission of your suggestion, a link will be sent to your email ID, enabling you to delete it, if you feel wrong input has been given. All suggestions will be submitted to the concerned sections by AIBSNLOA CHQ.

Past visitors wrote:

Manmohan Tue, 09 Jan 2018 17:05:42 GMT +5.5

A.K.Sharmaji from Ambala, Judgement of 147 has come and copy is available online. Any action to implement judgement demanded by Assns and affected officers??

No more delay as the case has been dragged beyond limit for so many years. Can it happen??

Balbir Tue, 09 Jan 2018 15:15:00 GMT +5.5

Aanandji, your update has become valid. If any one read issue No.3 in charter of demand of proposed TU Action as "No" to retirement age reduction and VRS. Etc., in your update can also be true.

What is going to happen is it not painful is much depend upon what will happen before 30-01-2018. What is the stand of AIBSNLOA??

Aanand Mon, 08 Jan 2018 11:28:19 GMT +5.5

PRC is diluted to be delayed or denied??

Funda of any CPC / PRC is to merge DA / IDA for which no hurdle can be posed. Having approved and accepted CPC recommendations and fully implemented, similar measures for PRC must also be implemented to do justice.

Fact is that DA / IDA cannot be denied since it is a cost compensation measure. Hence, delaying / denying DA / IDA merger is akin human right violation.

It is really disgusting to see delay in getting at least 0% fitment which is simple IDA merger?? If for this itself DoT is refusing adamantly, it is nothing but all Optees and BSNLians are being cheated.

Why Assns / Unions are to beg for this right??? If so, what else can be achieved??

Continuous Trade Union action can only bring bad name and result in losing that many days' salary of members.

Let all unite to demand and achieve.

Are there any condition posed by DoT to implement PRC?? This is because of ongoing rumors like 58, Efficacy based staff reduction, VRS, etc., Why nothing is heard or updated in sites??

Is it that option given has made us to lose everything forever??

AIBSNLOA being transparent, our GS to update and give clear picture please.

N.SREEKANTH RAO Sun, 07 Jan 2018 20:19:32 GMT +5.5

I request all the Associations' leaders to make every effort to make the following modifications in CCH proposal before being sent to BSNL Board for approval to offset the colossal loss suffered by the JTOs, who are yet to get their first promotion even after rendering 20 years of service.
1) The JTOs, who are in E4 scale as on 01-01-2017, shall be designated as Senior Manager. They shall be promoted as AGM after 3 years of service as Sr Manager.
2) The JTOs, who are in E3 scale as on 01-01-2017, shall also be designated as Sr Manager. They shall be promoted to AGM after completion of 5 years of service as Sr Manager.
The case filed by LDCE passed JTOs to stall the CCH approval is very much genuine and justified as the CCH proposal totally ignored them.
As the all the LDCE passed JTOs are in E3/E4 scale, the above modifications render justice to them. You must impel the Management to file the reply in the CAT, Ernakulam after making modifications without any delay to end the case.

With regards,
N. Sreekanth Rao

AK SHARMA AMBALA Sat, 16 Dec 2017 12:16:20 GMT +5.5

Comrade GS Sir,
It is appreciated that AIBSNLOA immediately taken a lead to persue the case with Jt. GM (Pers)after the decesion given by Honourabel Supreme Court on 147 and para 206. AIBSNLOA always move in the right direction.

Balbir Wed, 06 Dec 2017 11:46:57 GMT +5.5

Well said Satish bhai.

But, main and inherent issue is that whatever sales, marketing or expansion efforts are made by us are consumed up to 90% by rural loss making operations.

We have to get the revenue generated Vs Expenditure for every Exchange across BSNL to substantiate our claim for it to be claimed.

The net loss of and for rural services has to be got claimed and paid as per the given assurances.

Else, the same odd and weird swan song of loss making PSU will reasoned out to deny any benefit by vested interests in other side.

Assns / Unions to get it fixed and corrected for our financial and other prospects.

Satish Belgundi Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:07:03 GMT +5.5

The Affordability clause for implemention of 3rd PRC is for all PSU's and not for only BSNL. Going on strike demanding imlemention of 15% increase in pay is not correct. We have to meet the Honble Finance minister and Communications minister demanding removal of affordability clause with an amendentment to the cabinet decision. Then only we can get pay revision not otherwise.

A V Rama Subrahmanyam, P.S. in BSNL A.P. Circle, Vijayawada Thu, 16 Nov 2017 16:48:49 GMT +5.5

Respected Sir,

It is a great step in right direction to seek 15% fitment as per our PRC recommendations. Else Unions, may seek parity with other Absorbed employees.

With profound gratitude for all your efforts in my transfer to AP Circle.

Yours sincerely,

A.V. Rama Subrahmanyam
A.P. Telecom Circle

SANJAI SINGH Tue, 14 Nov 2017 23:06:18 GMT +5.5

Why only young executives are to be transferred, they have their children studying in schools and they also have different setups in their location. All the older executives have completed all their duties, they can move freely. I think they should be encouraged to take transfer and set examples before the young executives.

This is the problem with bsnl unions and associations, they always talk about the benefits of some specific cadre or some specific recruitment year.

R.K.Thakur Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:00:10 GMT +5.5

Very impressive praposal

guestbook Page - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 .....- 32