Suggestions Box

Please type in your suggestion(s) in brief on any issue related to improvement in various BSNL services, sales, marketing, tariff, infra-structure, day-to-day maintenance etc. Your email ID is required to avoid spam and email ID will not be displayed along with your suggestion. On submission of your suggestion, a link will be sent to your email ID, enabling you to delete it, if you feel wrong input has been given. All suggestions will be submitted to the concerned sections by AIBSNLOA CHQ.

Past visitors wrote:

Prakash Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:22:33 GMT +5.5

CPSU Hierarchy is pursued by association for its notification and implementation by 1-7-18 by BSNL so that Executives can retire with dignity in redesignated status.

Is there any iota of benefit in it? Why this much urgency is being displayed? Had this effort been put in achieving 3rd PRC implementation it would be beneficial to everyone of us. Any motive behind this??

Can anyone say how BSNL can notify without the approval of either DoT or DPE as put forth by a person earlier?

Just a fortnight ago, BSNL has listed equivalent grades in CPSUs / CPSEs in compliance to DPE / DoP&T letter. In such case, how can any modification be effected without the approval of Nodal & controlling Ministry? Its surprising

AK SHARMA Wed, 13 Jun 2018 12:42:34 GMT +5.5

Sadhan Chandra Das ji,
As per latest clarification from BSNL HO, if you were, otherwise, eligible, then benefit to retirees should also be extended.

Pankaj Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:05:20 GMT +5.5

Mr.Harimohan Rao,
In Govt Service, no promotion on Adhoc. Even in case of Adhoc promotion, it must be regularized within one year.

This funda is that Adhoc promotee can retires only in their lower regular grade. In such case, promotion will be made a mockery.

In PSU or PSE, there is no Adhoc at all i.e., promotions must always be in regular only.

In fact, in DoT perior, Adhoc has been sinister designed to be continued only to make DGM Adhoc promottee from standing in line to GM grade in case they are DGM (Regular).

Heard that only one officer with guts fought in legal forum to claim and get Regular DGM and he retired as DGM (Regular) in DoT era.

Mr. Harimohan Rao, if you are serious and concerned about your Adhoc status, start appealing and fight relentlessly to achieve it.

Mr. Sadan Chandra Das,
The letter is silent about whether retired ones are eligible. In such case, this will be effective only from the order date.

Sadhan Chandra Das, Kolkata Tue, 12 Jun 2018 21:48:16 GMT +5.5

It's not suggestions, it's a query, whether a retired DGM(Ad-hoc) may get the benefit E6 Scale from the recent order, please inform me.

k.harimohan rao Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:34:21 GMT +5.5

dgm regular promotion to be given as adhoc promotion was given 2years back ie in MAR' per rule adhoc to be Regularised with in 1yr.

Pankaj Thu, 07 Jun 2018 13:22:58 GMT +5.5

Deep sigh of relief to many senior Executives from working under a wrongly promoted far junior.

Thanks to everyone's effort who got it implemented to make justice prevail ultimately, though delayed.

What about 272 similar such promotted ones?? This case is hanging as "Civil Appeal in Apex Court". When 147 implemented and reverted, in similar lines, 272 also must be revised to instill same justice.

Also, one particular Officer who took this decision to tweak service rules to promote deliberately wrongly must be brought to books even if he is retired safely from DoT.

In latest order, recovery will not be effective for any of those 147.

In such case, affected seniors must claim on par pay to ensure that at no time junior draw more pay and get stepping up of pay.

All Assns must concentrate on implementation of same revised seniority for 272 before all of them retire and to make their affected seniors to get justice.

Though fall by two grade for few is painful, by virtue of their occupying seat, rude and audacious few among them deserve it for having treated everyone badly for almost a decade!!!!

Anil Sharma Wed, 06 Jun 2018 18:42:38 GMT +5.5

1.For howmuch vacancies SDE TO DE Regular DPC is going on.
2.SDEs of VY 2001-02 LDCE Quota of SL NO 8 will be covered or not.
Pl reply.

AJAY SUYRAWANSHI Tue, 05 Jun 2018 20:00:39 GMT +5.5

As Management is conducting DPC for AGM IN WHICH SDE SL 6&7is covered.But in SL 7 LDCE quota for vy 2001-2002 is not included.Pl do needfull for this.So that court cases may be avoided.

Pankaj Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:17:36 GMT +5.5

Some few facts about CPSU Hierarchy implementation, as felt and feared by majority of Executives:

Abolished SDE and DE / AGM posts rather than filling them with those eagerly waiting for years together for promotion.

Introduction of two posts viz., Sr. SDE / Sr. AO and Jt. DGM that is sure to prevent promotion to near vicinity of DGM or so called JAG post by none of promottees.

Non-implementation of Apex court ruled seniority revision to 147 Executives and safeguarding their status by upgrade of every one to ensure their non-reversion despite facing contempt.

Possible and immediate notification to fill DGMs from recruitment.

Contravening other Association demand that CPSU Hierarchy must commence from SDE cadre,it is only from DE / AGM cadre. Other Assn claims that many facts are not made public

Pending court cases on seniority are cake walked by implementing CPSU Hierarchy.

Possible denial of E6 TMB upgrade to Executives who are in E5 as of now and awaiting TBP by Oct'19.

When Sep'18 is the joining date of latest promoted DEs / AGMs, implementation is CPSU Hierarchy implementation cleverly and deliberately earmarked as 1-7-18, many of them will be denied even to reach Jt. DGM by their date of assumption of charge as Regular STS. Their upgrade as Jt. DGM is in question and will be delayed or postponed to Jan'19. This will affect them.

What is the yard stick of getting upgrade to Jt. DGM (NF) is not clear. Some say it as 4 year regular as STS and some say it as Regular STS with service of 31 years. Truth is not known or kept secret deliberately fearing filing of court case??

No Association is coming out with clearly as to whether CPSU Hierarchy, amidst pending court cases / implementation of verdict on seniority issues, how can it be unilaterally implemented by June'18 itself?

Seniors who are only few years away from retirement and on having waited and stagnated only to reach up to SDE / DE / Adhoc DGM, are going to be affected by implementation of CPSU Hierarchy.

Only few issues, as given above are submitted; many more prevails and / or yet to creep-in when it gets implemented, will it really shake the career progression of Executives to ultimately? or to result in none to work or reach as DGM in either Adhoc or regular status i.e., to only retire as Jt. DGM (NF).

Executives to be made NF forever and in any Cadre by CPSU Hierarchy? Time only will tell.

Ravi Kant Mon, 04 Jun 2018 16:21:32 GMT +5.5

DOT presidential order not uploaded correctly. kindly check and reload it.
dated 29.03.2017 (regarding Rs. 18850/-)

guestbook Page - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 .....- 41