Suggestions Box

Please type in your suggestion(s) in brief on any issue related to improvement in various BSNL services, sales, marketing, tariff, infra-structure, day-to-day maintenance etc. Your email ID is required to avoid spam and email ID will not be displayed along with your suggestion. On submission of your suggestion, a link will be sent to your email ID, enabling you to delete it, if you feel wrong input has been given. All suggestions will be submitted to the concerned sections by AIBSNLOA CHQ.

Past visitors wrote:

Balbir Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:30:02 GMT +5.5

Anil Sharmaji,

Seems, for a person to be protected from revision down by grades, it is being prolonged.

Seems also that (t)his Assn is working over time in another route to ensure face saving measure viz., cadre hierarchy.

Seniors are getting retired every month w/o seeing or sitting as DGM; none cares

Anil Sharma Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:03:59 GMT +5.5

What our Association is doing Sir ?

Aanand Tue, 03 Apr 2018 17:42:04 GMT +5.5


Verdict delivered and upheld by Apex Court...

Possible contempt at Pr CAT, ND.

Suit filed and admitted by same Pr CAT, ND against Apex court verdict to prolong seniority revision.

Gets going just like that for some more pathetic for genuine seniors on the verge of retirement.

Curse on them to retire without seeing JAG promotion is atrocious and who can help it??

Balbir Tue, 03 Apr 2018 11:16:46 GMT +5.5

Orders will be issued in few days was the comment but not getting issued...

Is it another pla(o)y to use court vacation time, to delay and prolong to favor choicest and interested person???

Aanand Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:36:58 GMT +5.5

Noted S.No.20 in 118 list???? Know the cause....for delay!!!

Balbir Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:12:33 GMT +5.5

Hope everyone is aware that "Justice Clock" is proposed to be installed in every Court of Judges to track pendency and Judgment deliveries.

This being the tendency of GoI, how implementation of revised seniority is being delayed this much after Apex court verdict?

Had this been implemented well before, this case would not have dragged for over 3 decades. Well to conclude that this has been done only with vested interest to divide our cadre.

In case implemented, what about similar case of 272? Whether this kind of seniority revision is applicable for this 272 group also as natural justice? Can it be expected off???

AK SHARMA Sat, 24 Mar 2018 12:52:32 GMT +5.5

GS Sir,
BSNL Corporate Office is already having complete data of all these officers, then with what intention CO is asking data from Circles again. BSNL CO should revise seniority of these officers and circulate the same, if there needs any correction that may be made on getting information from circles.

ajay Sat, 24 Mar 2018 08:25:59 GMT +5.5

pl see the list now published by CO on 23/3/18 in which 118 are showing out of 118.Some has joined as JTO in 1998 also.

Balbir Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:12:18 GMT +5.5

Implementation of Apex Court verdict to correct undue seniority of 147 is still dragging, despite clear instructions to DPC Cell. It is surprising why this much delay?

Any news about contempt petition filing against this delay? Pl update

Aanand Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:51:36 GMT +5.5

Anil Bhai,

Ye kya naya baath. Sir ghoom raha hai.

Suryawanshi says 147 become 47.

If Anil bhai's contention becomes tenable, then it may only be 7 or 0.

Tamasha hi hua seniority or promotion

guestbook Page - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 .....- 38