Suggestions Box

Please type in your suggestion(s) in brief on any issue related to improvement in various BSNL services, sales, marketing, tariff, infra-structure, day-to-day maintenance etc. Your email ID is required to avoid spam and email ID will not be displayed along with your suggestion. On submission of your suggestion, a link will be sent to your email ID, enabling you to delete it, if you feel wrong input has been given. All suggestions will be submitted to the concerned sections by AIBSNLOA CHQ.

Past visitors wrote:

N. SREEKANTH RAO Fri, 08 Nov 2019 08:41:28 GMT +5.5

The overwhelming response of both Executives and Non-Executives to VRS clearly demonstrates the frustration and anger of the employees on Executive Associations and Non-Executive Unions.
When the VRS is already rolled out and mass exodus of employees is taking place, SNEA General Secretary is still seeking some clarifications on VRS from BSNL Management. All the rank and file employees understood VRS, 2019 very well but he did not understand. It is not at all surprising. He, even being the one of the members of the Khan Committee, couldn't not understand the committee recommendations. SNEA leaders never understood the CPSE structure of promotion and utterly failed to get it implemented even after 19 years of BSNL formation. Most of the Executives, who were JTOs as on 01-10-2000, got retired and the remaining are about to bid audieu taking VRS with one promotion or without any promotion.
The decision of the employees to exercise VRS options en mass is the result of the ineptitude and incompetence of this sort of leaders.

Ombir Prasad Tue, 05 Nov 2019 13:58:10 GMT +5.5

VRS package is about to be uploaded. Now, serious doubts, as pointed out in the letter, is pension revision.

The other PSU's CMD has orally conveyed in an Association / TU meeting .

When he says so, can it become true? When Pension revision can be decided only by DoT, how his words can be real.

Hence, all Assns & TUs of BSNL are to be united to discuss various aspects of VRS and immediately seek clarifications on applicability of pension revision to VRS optees. Similarly, IT exemption on availing VRS also need to be conveyed after decision, only by DoT.

PRC implementation post VRS completion, has to be only on retrospective mode since 2017.

Based on such PRC revision, only on written clarification of pension revision to VRS optees, it can be ensured to be and become applicable, after exit on VRS.

Hence, only a written clarification of DoT can be of any use.

Sumonto Bose, Kolkata Sun, 03 Nov 2019 09:13:32 GMT +5.5

How can BSNL float VRS option for employees without settling their valid claims and depositing amounts deducted from salary under different heads viz. GPF, JETCCS, I.Tax, GSLI and Association subscriptions.

Prakash Sat, 26 Oct 2019 13:32:14 GMT +5.5

PRC is not before VRS implementation and delay is cited as loss of BSNL.

Who is responsible for loss? Management has not claimed compensation for loss when it is assured to be paid by DoT based on commitment of Sep'00 cabinet note.

For the great mistake of Management, why should serving employees to suffer losing PRC and also those who are to opt to go on VRS to go without PRC?

The PRC is due from 1-1-17 onwards and loss cannot be cited as DoT in its Sep'00 cabinet note has committed ever viable BSNL.

Also, viability package is being made by DoT is also the strategic importance of this PSU that has upheld to discharge social responsibilities despite loss without claiming compensation. This being the fact, DoT is also responsible for BSNL loss as it has not upheld Sep'00 cabinet note commitment on ever viability and compensation payment fronts.

For the mistakes of both BSNL Management as well as DoT why 3rd PRC has to be deliberately shunted to beyond VRS process to intentionally cause loss to optees? This also a great violation to Presidential Order commitment of assuring financial prospects after BSNL absorption.

When deputationsists work here with revised CPC scales drawing hefty pay pack, why optees to suffer loss only for the mistake of both BSNL management and DoT??

Assns and TUs please take up PRC and standard IDA pay scale to be implemented before VRS to do justice.

None even points this out or even recognizing the loss committed on us deliberately. Atrocious and intentional mistake to take toll on faithful BSNL optees. Recognize to spread awareness and act

Balbir Sat, 26 Oct 2019 13:05:26 GMT +5.5

VRS is almost imminent. Still non-standard IDA pay scale in BSNL?? MTNL was not having Rule-37A pension originally. But, they have got it later. Now, BSNL despite serving rural lossy service, not to implement standard scale and to offer VRS package with non standard scale is a heineous crime done on serving Executives. Please claim for implementing Standard IDA pay scale as directed by DPE years ago.

G.C.VERMA Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:01:23 GMT +5.5

"...Name or banner should not stand in the way of building such a unity." appreciatable. all may strengthen this voice.

G.C.VERMA Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:00:42 GMT +5.5

"...Name or banner should not stand in the way of building such a unity." appreciatable. all may strengthen this voice.

Balbir Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:24:27 GMT +5.5

Deputationists in BSNL have been paid with timely salary, in this month and last month also. Can anyone confirm???

N. Sreekanth Rao Hyderabad Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:19:01 GMT +5.5

Even after Group of Ministers, in which Finance Minister is one of the members, and Prime Minister's Office have given a green signal to the proposal for the revival of BSNL, stiff opposition by the Finance Ministry to revival plan is very strange and ridiculous.
When BSNL is not able to pay salaries to staff, only two options are left for the Government - revival of BSNL by offering bailout package or complete shutdown of BSNL.
The employees can't forbear the present dreadful situation furthermore.
Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad should immediately take up the issue to the Prime Minister for implementation of revival plan without any delay, setting aside all objections.

Ombir Prasad Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:58:23 GMT +5.5

Targetting executives has commenced by salary cut in case they fail to achieve sales target of SIM and BB with landline connection.

Is there any justification to punish only field executives who are already in agony on not getting salary besides so many other constraints.

Owning responsibility must begin from top on first instance and to serve as a model. Then only fixing responsibility can be allowed. Associations to intervene to stop and protect any adverse impact and victimization of field executives please

guestbook Page - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 .....- 51