Suggestions Box

Please type in your suggestion(s) in brief on any issue related to improvement in various BSNL services, sales, marketing, tariff, infra-structure, day-to-day maintenance etc. Your email ID is required to avoid spam and email ID will not be displayed along with your suggestion. On submission of your suggestion, a link will be sent to your email ID, enabling you to delete it, if you feel wrong input has been given. All suggestions will be submitted to the concerned sections by AIBSNLOA CHQ.

Past visitors wrote:

Prakash Sat, 26 Oct 2019 13:32:14 GMT +5.5

PRC is not before VRS implementation and delay is cited as loss of BSNL.

Who is responsible for loss? Management has not claimed compensation for loss when it is assured to be paid by DoT based on commitment of Sep'00 cabinet note.

For the great mistake of Management, why should serving employees to suffer losing PRC and also those who are to opt to go on VRS to go without PRC?

The PRC is due from 1-1-17 onwards and loss cannot be cited as DoT in its Sep'00 cabinet note has committed ever viable BSNL.

Also, viability package is being made by DoT is also the strategic importance of this PSU that has upheld to discharge social responsibilities despite loss without claiming compensation. This being the fact, DoT is also responsible for BSNL loss as it has not upheld Sep'00 cabinet note commitment on ever viability and compensation payment fronts.

For the mistakes of both BSNL Management as well as DoT why 3rd PRC has to be deliberately shunted to beyond VRS process to intentionally cause loss to optees? This also a great violation to Presidential Order commitment of assuring financial prospects after BSNL absorption.

When deputationsists work here with revised CPC scales drawing hefty pay pack, why optees to suffer loss only for the mistake of both BSNL management and DoT??

Assns and TUs please take up PRC and standard IDA pay scale to be implemented before VRS to do justice.

None even points this out or even recognizing the loss committed on us deliberately. Atrocious and intentional mistake to take toll on faithful BSNL optees. Recognize to spread awareness and act

Balbir Sat, 26 Oct 2019 13:05:26 GMT +5.5

VRS is almost imminent. Still non-standard IDA pay scale in BSNL?? MTNL was not having Rule-37A pension originally. But, they have got it later. Now, BSNL despite serving rural lossy service, not to implement standard scale and to offer VRS package with non standard scale is a heineous crime done on serving Executives. Please claim for implementing Standard IDA pay scale as directed by DPE years ago.

G.C.VERMA Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:01:23 GMT +5.5

"...Name or banner should not stand in the way of building such a unity." appreciatable. all may strengthen this voice.

G.C.VERMA Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:00:42 GMT +5.5

"...Name or banner should not stand in the way of building such a unity." appreciatable. all may strengthen this voice.

Balbir Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:24:27 GMT +5.5

Deputationists in BSNL have been paid with timely salary, in this month and last month also. Can anyone confirm???

N. Sreekanth Rao Hyderabad Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:19:01 GMT +5.5

Even after Group of Ministers, in which Finance Minister is one of the members, and Prime Minister's Office have given a green signal to the proposal for the revival of BSNL, stiff opposition by the Finance Ministry to revival plan is very strange and ridiculous.
When BSNL is not able to pay salaries to staff, only two options are left for the Government - revival of BSNL by offering bailout package or complete shutdown of BSNL.
The employees can't forbear the present dreadful situation furthermore.
Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad should immediately take up the issue to the Prime Minister for implementation of revival plan without any delay, setting aside all objections.

Ombir Prasad Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:58:23 GMT +5.5

Targetting executives has commenced by salary cut in case they fail to achieve sales target of SIM and BB with landline connection.

Is there any justification to punish only field executives who are already in agony on not getting salary besides so many other constraints.

Owning responsibility must begin from top on first instance and to serve as a model. Then only fixing responsibility can be allowed. Associations to intervene to stop and protect any adverse impact and victimization of field executives please

Balbir Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:58:46 GMT +5.5

Sreekanth Rao,
What a satire it was... in your last update that everything they achieved.

They are mentally setting up their mind to form yet another Association umbrella when mass retirement on VRS comes. After all, they are comfortable with automatic money flow as subscription. They want to repeat this act in that umbrella for which it is a precursor.

N. Sreekanth Rao Hyderabad Sun, 08 Sep 2019 18:10:42 GMT +5.5

There is a news that a new Association called 'Sanchar Nigam Executive's Pensioners Welfare Association (SNEPWA)' is going to be launched shortly by retired SNEA leaders.
SNEA achieved everything for us and resolved all the HR issues.
1) E2 and E3 scales for JTO and SDE are implemented.
2) CPSU cadre hierarchy is implemented from 01-10-2000.
3) Uniform First Time Bound Promotion for 4 years is implemented.
4) 3rd PRC is implemented with 15% fitment.
SNEA proclaimed at the time of membership verification that all the HR issues would be resolved in three months' time, but they were able to resolve all the issues in three weeks' time only. It is really amazing!
When 4G spectrum is about to be allocated to BSNL, SNEA is demanding to allocate 5G spectrum. What a great foresight! SNEPWA may demand for 6G.
When SNEA was successful in resolution of all the issues of working Executives, why can't SNEPWA succeed in resolving retired Executives' issues?
SNEPWA is being formed only for the welfare of the retired Executives, not for the collection of membership subscription from the retired Executives. It is the apt time for launching of Pensioners' Association as thousands of SNEA Executives may opt for VRS.

Balbir Sat, 17 Aug 2019 15:58:59 GMT +5.5

One Association has woken up it seems. Its website update reveals that Member(Fin)of DoT was met to urge upon refund of pending due amounts for many items like Interest paid on BWA spectrum, Excess pension contribution of 2700 Crores,Compensation for 17000 rural Telephones exchanges to the tune of 19000 Crores, etc., which works out to minimum of 21,700 Crores.
What about these dues for the past two decades of our rural operation? Can it be taken as free of cost that will make us to be deprived of financial benefits including 3rd PRC for which incurred loss all these years is being cited by DoT also?? Not acceptable at all and also great injustice.

Sttill, vital and urgent priority issues like Standard Pay Scale, implementation of pending items of 2nd PRC and also 3rd PRC with 15% weightage.

These priority issues need to be urged to be immediately given to BSNL employees before announcing any VRS package.

Without these items' paid atleast prospectively, we will be put to greatest loss of VRS and also pension which will result only on excise of our BSNL option, for entire life of one and all.

The unopted have all got 7th CPC with entire amount of arrears whereas we not paid till date.

Let our Association also demand all these be paid before VRS package if any to be announced please.

guestbook Page - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 .....- 52